[PATCH 1/8] PR ld/17878: Add bfd_maybe_object_p
Alex Velenko
Alex.Velenko@arm.com
Thu Feb 19 16:55:00 GMT 2015
On 09/02/15 04:36, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 4:50 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 1:42 AM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 05:54:40AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>> This patch adds bfd_maybe_object_p which is similar to
>>>>
>>>> bfd_check_format (abfd, bfd_object)
>>>>
>>>> The difference is bfd_maybe_object_p takes an argument to indicate if a
>>>> compiler plug-in library is applied. When a compiler plug-in library is
>>>> active, it also returns TRUE if the file is not an archive or a coredump
>>>> file.
>>>
>>> Hmm, in other words, if it is unknown. (bfd_format takes the values
>>> bfd_unknown, bfd_object, bfd_archive, bfd_core.)
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>>> +bfd_boolean
>>>> +bfd_maybe_object_p (bfd *abfd, bfd_boolean plugin_active_p)
>>>> +{
>>>> + /* LTO IR object file may look like a bfd_object file or a file which
>>>> + is not bfd_core nor bfd_archive. */
>>>> + return (bfd_check_format (abfd, bfd_object)
>>>> + || (plugin_active_p
>>>> + && !bfd_check_format (abfd, bfd_core)
>>>> + && !bfd_check_format (abfd, bfd_archive)));
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> I find this really strange. If plugins are active then you're
>>> willing to accept anything except cores and archives. To throw out
>>> cores and archives you'll be iterating over all compiled-in bfd
>>> targets, asking "is this a core file", then asking "is this an
>>> archive". That's quite a bit of processing, and won't exclude your
>>> average text file!
>>
>> LTO IR could be stored in the average text file. The new plug tests
>> use this feature. We can add a new type, bfd_maybe_object.
>>
>>> I think you need to find a way of answering the question "is this a
>>> file accepted by a plugin?" in a more robust way. One possibility is
>>> merging the linker handling of plugins into the bfd plugin support.
>>>
>>
>> I have considered it before. This approach has many implications.
>> If we do this, we need to add bfd_plugin_object and bfd_all_object.
>> bfd_all_object includes bfd_object and bfd_plugin_object. We need
>> bfd_plugin_object so that we won't update dummy BFD info from the
>> LTO IR input. Let me take another look.
>>
>
> Here is a draft to make linker plugin_object_p available to BFD:
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=patch;h=23903a326cd1cb205902698bb61f9deb1d1bf9a9
>
> I will submit a proper patch tomorrow.
>
Hi Lu,
After this patch on arm-none-eabi and arm-none-linux-gnueabihf I see
following regressions:
FAIL: load plugin 2 with source
FAIL: load plugin 3 with source
FAIL: plugin 2 with source lib
FAIL: plugin 3 with source lib
FAIL: plugin claimfile replace symbol with source
FAIL: plugin claimfile resolve symbol with source
when I run test src/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/func.c
, I see:
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/install/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc
-B/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/work/fsf-trunk-3/src/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin -O2
-specs=rdimon.specs -Wa,-mno-warn-deprecated -mthumb -O2 -c
/work/fsf-trunk-3/src/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/text.c -o
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/tmpdir/text.o
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/install/bin/arm-none-eabi-gcc
-B/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/work/fsf-trunk-3/src/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin -O2
-specs=rdimon.specs -Wa,-mno-warn-deprecated -mthumb -O2 -c
/work/fsf-trunk-3/src/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/main.c -o
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/tmpdir/main.o
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/ld-new -o
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/tmpdir/main.x
-L/work/fsf-trunk-3/src/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin -plugin
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/.libs/libldtestplug2.so.0
-plugin-opt registerclaimfile -plugin-opt registerallsymbolsread
-plugin-opt registercleanup -plugin-opt dumpresolutions
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/tmpdir/main.o
/work/fsf-trunk-3/src/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/func.c
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/tmpdir/text.o
--defsym __stack_chk_fail=0 --defsym __gccmain=0 --defsym printf=main
--defsym puts=main
hook called: all symbols read.
Input: /work/fsf-trunk-3/src/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/func.c
(/work/fsf-trunk-3/src/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/func.c)
Sym: 'func' Resolution: LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF
Sym: '_func' Resolution: LDPR_PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/ld-new:
/work/fsf-trunk-3/src/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/func.c (symbol
from plugin)(func): warning: interworking not enabled.
first occurrence:
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/tmpdir/main.o:
Thumb call to ARM
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/ld-new:
/work/fsf-trunk-3/src/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/func.c (symbol
from plugin)(func): warning: interworking not enabled.
first occurrence:
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/tmpdir/main.o:
Thumb call to ARM
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/ld-new: warning:
cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 0000000000008000
/work/fsf-trunk-3/build-arm-none-eabi/obj/binutils/ld/tmpdir/main.o: In
function `main':
main.c:(.text.startup+0xa): undefined reference to `func'
hook called: cleanup.
Kind regards,
Alex
More information about the Binutils
mailing list