[PATCH 0/8] PR ld/17878: Add and use bfd_maybe_object_p

[H.J. Lu]

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:
>
>> On 05 Feb 2015, at 14:52, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tests are added to verify if nm, ar and ld can properly handle LTO IR
>> stored in plain text file.
>
>>  Use bfd_maybe_object_p in elf64-ia64-vms.c
>>  Use bfd_maybe_object_p in vms-alpha.c
>>  Use bfd_maybe_object_p in vms-lib.c
>>  Use bfd_maybe_object_p in xcofflink.c
>>  Use bfd_maybe_object_p in ecoff.c
>>  Use bfd_maybe_object_p in coff-rs6000.c
>
> None of these formats supports LTO (even less LLVM LTO), so I
> assume they were modified for uniformity, right ?

Yes.  That is why I put them in separate patches.

-- 
H.J.