[PATCH] Use per instruction prefix control.
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Mon Apr 6 15:57:00 GMT 2015
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Ilya Tocar <tocarip.intel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To deal with problems like
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17898
> We need more fine-grained prefix control than
> twobyte_has_mandatory_prefix[256]
> Attached patch adds mandatory_prefix field to struct dis386,
> which will be used to control allowed/mandatory/forbidden prefixes on
> per instruction basis.
>
A prefix can be optional for an opcode which may be UD
with the other prefixes. Please remove
#define PREFIX_OPTIONAL 0
and replace
{ "vfpclassss", { XMask, EXxmm_md, Ib }, PREFIX_OPTIONAL },
with
{ "vfpclassss", { XMask, EXxmm_md, Ib }, 0 },
OK with this change.
Thanks.
--
H.J.
More information about the Binutils
mailing list