[Patch]: fix arm-eabi build failure on non-C99 systems

[Richard Earnshaw]

On 16/09/14 13:21, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> gas/config/tc-arm.c uses int64_t, which isn't available on non C99 compliant systems (like mingw32).
> As bfd provides typedef for these types, better to use them.
> 
> No regression for arm-eabi.
> Ok to commit ?
> 

OK.

You might also want to look at tc-aarch64.c and tc-nds32.c, both of
which use int64_t.  Consider the aarch64 changes pre-approved.

R.

> Tristan.
> 
> gas/
> 2014-09-16  Tristan Gingold  <gingold@adacore.com>
> 
> 	* config/tc-arm.c (move_or_literal_pool, add_to_lit_pool): Use
> 	bfd_int64_t instead of int64_t.
> 
> index cd3db2b..5077f87 100644
> --- a/gas/config/tc-arm.c
> +++ b/gas/config/tc-arm.c
> @@ -3200,7 +3200,7 @@ add_to_lit_pool (unsigned int nbytes)
>        imm1 = inst.operands[1].imm;
>        imm2 = (inst.operands[1].regisimm ? inst.operands[1].reg
>  	       : inst.reloc.exp.X_unsigned ? 0
> -	       : ((int64_t) inst.operands[1].imm) >> 32);
> +	       : ((bfd_int64_t) inst.operands[1].imm) >> 32);
>        if (target_big_endian)
>  	{
>  	  imm1 = imm2;
> @@ -7812,7 +7812,7 @@ move_or_literal_pool (int i, enum lit_type t, bfd_boolean mode_3)
>  			   ? inst.operands[1].reg
>  			   : inst.reloc.exp.X_unsigned
>  			     ? 0
> -			     : ((int64_t)((int) immlo)) >> 32;
> +			     : ((bfd_int64_t)((int) immlo)) >> 32;
>  	  int cmode = neon_cmode_for_move_imm (immlo, immhi, FALSE, &immbits,
>  					       &op, 64, NT_invtype);
>  
> 
>