[PATCH] PR ld/17618: Check PC-relative offset overflow in PLT entry

H.J. Lu hongjiu.lu@intel.com
Thu Nov 20 21:37:00 GMT 2014


On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:11:13AM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I checked in this patch to check PC-relative offset overflow in pushq
> instruction in x86-64 PLT entry.
> 
> 

I checked in this patch to avoid running pr17618.d test on x32 since
it needs more than 4GB memory.

H.J.
---
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog b/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog
index f959d55..8e69a89 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
 2014-11-20  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
 
+	* ld-x86-64/pr17618.d: Don't run on x32.
+
+2014-11-20  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
 	* ld-x86-64/plt-main1.rd: Updated for x32.
 	* ld-x86-64/plt-main2.rd: Likewise.
 	* ld-x86-64/plt-main3.rd: Likewise.
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr17618.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr17618.d
index e640b40..b090aa0 100644
--- a/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr17618.d
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr17618.d
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 #name: PLT PC-relative offset overflow check
 #as: --64
 #ld: -shared -melf_x86_64
+#notarget: x86_64-*-linux*-gnux32
 #error: .*PC-relative offset overflow in PLT entry for `bar'



More information about the Binutils mailing list