[AArch64/PATCH 0/2 (v2)] XGene-1 and XGene-2 assembly targets
Tue Nov 18 13:57:00 GMT 2014
On 18 November 2014 13:31, Tristan Gingold <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On 18 Nov 2014, at 14:25, Christophe Lyon <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On 18 November 2014 12:21, Matthias Klose <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> On 11/18/2014 12:06 PM, Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>>>> * 'xgene1' is introduced in addition to 'xgene-1', as the additional
>>>> dash was deemed too confusing... we retain the 'xgene-1' name as
>>>> a deprecated alias, as binutils-2.25 was released with this name
>>>> in place.
>>> 2.25 wasn't yet released. So please can you get this into the 2.25 branch as
>> Since 2.25 wasn't released yet, is Marcus' point in the other thread
>> relevant? (regarding keeping xgene-1 because binutils-2.25 have been
> Indeed, do we want to keep xgene-1 alias or not ?
Since the name hasn't made it to a production toolchain then removing
the alias seems reasonable to me.
More information about the Binutils