copyright dates in binutils (and includes/)

Alan Modra
Wed Mar 5 12:34:00 GMT 2014

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 01:33:18PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Alan Modra <> writes:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:14:51PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> >> I'll post separately.
> Thanks for doing this, looks good to me FWIW.  I don't know whether
> we want to keep a single script for both GCC and binutils+gdb or fork,
> but probably separate copies makes sense.

I guess we have 8 months to decide what to do with my hacks. :-)  If
you choose to merge my changes that's fine by me too.

> As far as including include/ goes: the only reason that didn't happen
> for gcc/ was because I didn't want to sort out which files were GCC-
> specific and whether binutils, GCC or GDB was the master for each file.
> So if we do your option (b) I think we should do (c) as well.  I suppose
> that means syncing GCC's include/ with binutils+gdb and then adding
> GCC's include/ to the list of "approved" directories.  I'm happy to try
> that if it sounds OK.  (Maybe after the 4.9 release, not sure.)

I'm happy with (c, but for now have committed just the other changes.

Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

More information about the Binutils mailing list