[Patch] pe/coff x86-64: improve dump of unwind v2

[Corinna Vinschen]

Hi Tristan,


thanks for following up on this with a patch.  I'm just a bit confused
about the first EPILOG info value.  First you write:

On Dec  4 15:47, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> [...] the first EPILOG opcode contains the length of the epilogue, [...]
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Then you write:

> I am not sure about the meaning of the info of the first EPILOG opcode. It looks like
> it is set to 1 if there is an epilog at the end of the function. [...]
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Which one wins?


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20131204/3e2681bb/attachment.sig>