macro's and local variables

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 18.10.12 at 17:58, John Reiser <jreiser@bitwagon.com> wrote:
> On 10/18/2012 08:09 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:
>> Sounds to me, it would be a better plan to make sure that the assembler 
> accepts it '<<' both with and without '.altmacro' :)
> 
> I agree that the assembler should accept the full syntax and all operators
> for C expressions.  Recently I have rued the lack of unary '!' (negation of
> truth value, including '!!' as characteristic function {true==>1, false==>0})
> and trinary "?:" (conditional evaluation).

I don't follow - an assembler is an assembler, not a C compiler.

Jan