[Patch, microblaze, gas, bfd] PR/14736 Correct adjustment of global symbols after relax

Michael Eager eager@eagerm.com
Thu Nov 29 02:02:00 GMT 2012


On 11/22/2012 04:05 AM, David Holsgrove wrote:
>
> Fixup symbol sizes after linker relaxation
>
> Correct an off-by one when comparing relaxation addresses
> with symbol start.
>
> Also addresses PR/14736 where clang gave warning;
> use of unary operator that may be intended as
> compound assignment (-=)
>
> binutils/bfd/Changelog
>
>   2012-11-22  Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
>
>            * elf32-microblaze.c (calc_size_fixup): New
>              (calc_fixup): Use calc_size_fixup to adjust
>              object size
>
> binutils/gas/testsuite/Changelog
>
>   2012-11-22  David Holsgrove  <david.holsgrove@xilinx.com>
>
>            * gas/microblaze/relax_size.exp: New file - test
>              object size after linker relaxation
>            * gas/microblaze/relax_size.s: Likewise
>            * gas/microblaze/relax_size.elf: Likewise

calc_size_fixup() is almost the same as calc_fixup().  Comments say they
do the same thing.  Are both needed?  When would the values returned be different?

+            int count, count_size;
+
+            count = calc_fixup (isym->st_value, sec);
+            count_size = calc_size_fixup (isym->st_value, isym->st_size, sec);

The values returned by calc_fixup() and calc_size_fixup() are not counts, but
the total size of the fixups.  Please use more descriptive names (2 places).

-- 
Michael Eager	 eager@eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306  650-325-8077




More information about the Binutils mailing list