PATCH: PR gas/14859: Redundant ASP generated for jecxz

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 20.11.12 at 15:33, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> --- a/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
> +++ b/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ jg, 1, 0x7f, None, 1, 0, Jump|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf,
>  // jcxz vs. jecxz is chosen on the basis of the address size prefix.
>  jcxz, 1, 0xe3, None, 1, CpuNo64, JumpByte|Size16|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Disp8|Disp16|Disp32 }
>  jecxz, 1, 0xe3, None, 1, CpuNo64, JumpByte|Size32|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Disp8|Disp16|Disp32 }
> -jecxz, 1, 0x67e3, None, 2, Cpu64, JumpByte|Size32|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Disp8|Disp32|Disp32S }
> +jecxz, 1, 0xe3, None, 1, Cpu64, JumpByte|Size32|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf, { Disp8|Disp32|Disp32S }

I too had a fix for this pending, going a step further and folding
the two jecxz entries into one (they're not meaningfully different
anymore).

Jan

>  jrcxz, 1, 0xe3, None, 1, Cpu64, JumpByte|Size64|No_bSuf|No_wSuf|No_lSuf|No_sSuf|No_qSuf|No_ldSuf|NoRex64, { Disp8|Disp32|Disp32S }
>  
>  // The loop instructions also use the address size prefix to select