top-level configure.ac changes lost in sync

Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org
Thu Nov 15 00:39:00 GMT 2012


On Wednesday 14 November 2012 19:27:07 H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Roland McGrath <mcgrathr@google.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:19 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> It was an oversight.  Sorry for that.
> > 
> > These things happen.  I just want to get it resolved now, and ideally get
> > something (comments if nothing else) in place that reduces the likelihood
> > of a similar oversight in the future.
> > 
> >> You should apply toplevel file changes to GCC and src trees at the same
> >> time.
> > 
> > How are the logistics of that supposed to work?
> > When someone gives approval on the binutils mailing list, does that
> > confer approval to make the same commit in the GCC repository?
> 
> Yes, since toplevel files are shared.
> 
> > I have write-after-approval in binutils (src) but no write access to GCC.
> > Should I just have write access to GCC too?  How do I get it?
> 
> You can send an email to GCC patches mailing list to ask
> someone to check it in for you.

or find someone to sponsor you for commit access to the gcc tree ... i'm sure 
there are plenty of them laying about in MTV ;)
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20121115/81bc3588/attachment.sig>


More information about the Binutils mailing list