[RFC/PATCH] Fix `bfd_{get,set}_*' macros

Sergio Durigan Junior sergiodj@redhat.com
Wed May 16 19:48:00 GMT 2012


On Wednesday, May 16 2012, nick clifton wrote:

> Hi Sergio,
>
>> 2012-05-04  Sergio Durigan Junior<sergiodj@redhat.com>
>>
>> 	* bfd-in2.h (bfd_get_section_name, bfd_get_section_vma,
>> 	bfd_get_section_lma, bfd_get_section_alignment,
>> 	bfd_get_section_flags,
>> 	bfd_get_section_userdata): Rewrite macros in order to use the
>> 	`bfd' argument.
>> 	* elf-vxworks.c (elf_vxworks_finish_dynamic_entry): Pass proper `bfd'
>> 	as the first argument for `bfd_get_section_alignment'.
>> 	* elf32-arm.c (create_ifunc_sections): Likewise, for
>> 	`bfd_set_section_alignment'.
>> 	* elf32-m32r.c (m32r_elf_relocate_section): Likewise, for
>> 	`bfd_get_section_name'.
>> 	* elf32-microblaze.c (microblaze_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
>> 	* elf32-ppc.c (ppc_elf_size_dynamic_sections): Likewise.
>> 	(ppc_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
>> 	* elf64-mmix.c (mmix_final_link_relocate): Likewise, for
>> 	`bfd_get_section_vma'.
>> 	* elf64-ppc.c (create_linkage_sections): Likewise, for
>> 	`bfd_set_section_alignment'.
>
> I have applied this patch.  There were however a few problems with it:

Hello Nick,

Thanks a lot for pointing out the errors.  I really did not test using
--enable-targets=all (somehow I thought this flag was specific to
GDB!).  Anyway, this won't happen again.

Thanks a lot,

-- 
Sergio



More information about the Binutils mailing list