RFA: performance improvement for PowerPC disassembly

[Alan Modra]

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:33:39AM -0400, James Lemke wrote:
> table segments.  Wouldn't it be preferable to keep a #define for the
> number of segments versus having 64 or 65 in various places?

I avoided a define because the value can't be changed as you could
with the original implementation.  Incidentally, "various places" is
just two places, the array definition and its initialisation a few
lines later.  I suppose I could have used sizeof in the
initialisation, or #define NUM_MAJOR_OPCODES 64 and used that to add
a little documentation in the code.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM