[GOLD][PATCH] Fix ARM backend's handling of protected symbol in a DSO

Ian Lance Taylor iant@google.com
Wed Mar 14 17:00:00 GMT 2012


"Doug Kwan (關振德)" <dougkwan@google.com> writes:

> 2012-03-14  Doug Kwan  <dougkwan@google.com>
>
> 	* gold/arm.cc (Target_arm::Scan::global): Generate R_ARM_GLOB_DAT
> 	dynamic relocations for protected symbols in shared objects.
>
> Index: gold/arm.cc
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gold/arm.cc,v
> retrieving revision 1.146
> diff -u -u -p -r1.146 arm.cc
> --- gold/arm.cc	3 Feb 2012 20:01:01 -0000	1.146
> +++ gold/arm.cc	14 Mar 2012 08:44:14 -0000
> @@ -8314,7 +8314,9 @@ Target_arm<big_endian>::Scan::global(Sym
>  	    Reloc_section* rel_dyn = target->rel_dyn_section(layout);
>  	    if (gsym->is_from_dynobj()
>  		|| gsym->is_undefined()
> -		|| gsym->is_preemptible())
> +		|| gsym->is_preemptible()
> +		|| (gsym->visibility() == elfcpp::STV_PROTECTED
> +		    && parameters->options().shared()))
>  	      got->add_global_with_rel(gsym, GOT_TYPE_STANDARD,
>  				       rel_dyn, elfcpp::R_ARM_GLOB_DAT);
>  	    else


Usually tests for whether to generate a dynamic reloc should check
parameters->options().output_is_position_independent() rather than
parameters->options().shared().  The difference is that the former is
also true for -pie.

Ian



More information about the Binutils mailing list