[PATCH] MIPS: Opcode membership proposal

[Maciej W. Rozycki]

On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Richard Sandiford wrote:

> >  Hmm, where's the typo?  That's supposed to be true as long as the CPU is 
> > other than Octeon or the Octeon exclusion bit is zero.  Did I get that 
> > wrong?
> 
> The typo is in the last line I quoted:
> 
> >> > +     && ((cpu != CPU_OCTEON || ((insn)->exclusions & CPU_OCTEON) == 0)	
>                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> CPU_OCTEON is an enum value (6501), not a bitmask value.  As I say,
> it looked like it should be "((insn)->exclusions & INSN_OCTEON) == 0"
> instead.

 Awww!

> Patch is OK.

 And now in, thanks.

  Maciej