RFC: Add STB_GNU_SECONDARY
Mon Apr 23 19:30:00 GMT 2012
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Joern Rennecke <email@example.com> wrote:
> Quoting "H.J. Lu" <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
>> Putting our own foo in a section with a special prefix in section name,
>> like .secondary_*, works with linker support. But it isn't very reliable.
> In what way is requiring linker support for STB_GNU_SECONDARY more reliable
> than requiring linker support for .secondary_* sections?
It may lead to conflict with section __attribute__ in C source and section
directive in assembly code.
More information about the Binutils