RFC: Add STB_GNU_SECONDARY
Fri Apr 20 22:49:00 GMT 2012
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Cary Coutant <email@example.com> wrote:
>> We only have very few bits to in STB_XXX field.
> This is exactly why I'm not in favor of this extension. The feature
> doesn't seem compelling enough to use up one of these precious
> reserved values (in fact, you're using the next-to-last one that's
> reserved for OS use).
> You want a backup definition? Put a weak def at the end of the link line.
It doesn't work for us since the backup definition is
always used even if there is a normal definition in
a shared library or an archive.
More information about the Binutils