[PATCH] OMF support for BFD
Paul Smedley
paul@smedley.id.au
Mon Sep 19 21:05:00 GMT 2011
Hi Bernd,
On 19/09/11 03:09, Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 6:25 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson<hp@bitrange.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
>>> Does anybody have access to MASM? For that matter, Borland's Turbo
>>> Assembler?
>>
>> You don't mention it, so... wouldn't wasm
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Watcom_Assembler> help?
>
> The more, the merrier. In particular, I'm hoping there's an assembler
> out there (or compiler, for that matter) that "optimizes" relocations
> by gathering common relocation "targets" (read: addends) into what OMF
> calls THREAD subrecords of the FIXUPP record. (And then references
> these THREADs in subsequent FIXUPs instead of specifying the "targets"
> separately in each FIXUP. Neither NASM nor Turbo Assembler (with DJ's
> simple test objects) seem to do this.
I posted on your site, but omf is also used on OS/2. Currently OS/2 gcc
use a.out but the linker converts to omf on the fly.
Thanks for your work on this - it's interesting to a few OS/2 nerds too :)
Cheers,
Paul
More information about the Binutils
mailing list