binutils-2.21a missing from FTP site
Nick Clifton
nickc@redhat.com
Wed Sep 7 10:26:00 GMT 2011
Hi Matt,
> If regenerating binutils-2.21 is too much trouble, or seen as pointless,
> that's fine, we can just advise any of our users that ask about it to just use
> 2.21.1a.
You can also tell your users that the only reason that they would need
the 2.21.1a tarball (over the 2.21.1 tarball) is if they intend to make
changes to the FR30, IP2K, MEP, OPENRISC or XSTORMY16 files in the
opcodes directory and they want to be able to submit those changes back
to the FSF.
Cheers
Nick
More information about the Binutils
mailing list