binutils-2.21a missing from FTP site

Nick Clifton nickc@redhat.com
Wed Sep 7 10:26:00 GMT 2011


Hi Matt,

> If regenerating binutils-2.21 is too much trouble, or seen as pointless,
> that's fine, we can just advise any of our users that ask about it to just use
> 2.21.1a.

You can also tell your users that the only reason that they would need 
the 2.21.1a tarball (over the 2.21.1 tarball) is if they intend to make 
changes to the FR30, IP2K, MEP, OPENRISC or XSTORMY16 files in the 
opcodes directory and they want to be able to submit those changes back 
to the FSF.

Cheers
   Nick




More information about the Binutils mailing list