[gold patch] Incremental 13/18: Dynamic relocations

[Cary Coutant]

> I don't mind having Sized_relobj_base when just a couple of things refer
> to it, but it looks wrong when lots of functions use it.  The name of a
> class should indicate what sort of thing it is, rather than its position
> in the class heirarchy.  We should consider renaming, e.g.,
> Sized_relobj_base => Sized_relobj, Sized_relobj => Sized_relobj_file,
> Sized_incr_relobj => Sized_relobj_incr.  I'm open to other suggestions.

Done.

>> +  // Create the rela_dyn section.
>> +  (void)this->rela_dyn_section(layout);
>
> Drop the "(void)".

Done.

> This is OK with those changes.

Thanks, committed.

-cary