Problems with linker on Alpha
Michael Cree
mcree@orcon.net.nz
Tue May 3 09:21:00 GMT 2011
On 03/05/11 07:26, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/30/2011 07:25 PM, Michael Cree wrote:
>> Secondly, I noted a number of test suite failures in the ld component
>> while building binutils.
>
> "Large number"? I get
[...snip...]
> === ld tests ===
>
> Running target alpha-qemu
> FAIL: plugin claimfile lost symbol
> FAIL: plugin claimfile replace symbol
> FAIL: plugin claimfile resolve symbol
> XPASS: Preserve default . = 0
> XPASS: Preserve explicit . = 0
>
> === ld Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes 278
> # of unexpected failures 3
> # of unexpected successes 2
> # of expected failures 7
Building binutils 2.21.51.20110419-2 from Debian (also with my fix tls
patch) I get:
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: Build libpr9676-4a.so
FAIL: Build libpr9679.so
FAIL: vers24a
FAIL: vers24b
FAIL: vers24c
FAIL: vers30
FAIL: vers31
FAIL: plugin claimfile lost symbol
FAIL: plugin claimfile replace symbol
FAIL: plugin claimfile resolve symbol
XPASS: Preserve default . = 0
XPASS: Preserve explicit . = 0
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 505
# of unexpected failures 10
# of unexpected successes 2
# of expected failures 34
# of untested testcases 1
I see there's a lot more tests done with the unix target, nevertheless
I'll re-test with binutils master cvs to see if some of those unexpected
failures go away.
Cheers
Michael.
More information about the Binutils
mailing list