Certainly not a typo in binuti

[Douglas B Rupp]

On 3/31/2011 2:55 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> Honestly I am a bit skeptical about this feature.  The primary purpose of gas is to
> assemble what gcc generates and IMHO uppercasing would better be done by gcc.
>
> In particular uppercasing is somewhat ambiguous:  should all symbols be converted or
> only the exported one ?

We are speaking only of hand-coded assembler, correct?  AFAIK all HP 
branded VMS compilers generate object code directly.