PATCH SET: DragonFly BSD, config.guess, and config.rpath

[MFL Commissioner]

Hi,
I submitted these patches via mail list a few days ago and nobody with a 
commit bit seems to be picking it up.  Is there somebody specific that I 
need to talk to?  What needs to happen to get these pretty trivial 
configuration changes into the trunk and branch 2.21?

Regards,
John

P.S. We are talking about #1 and #2 only, and the commit messages need 
to be corrected on the fly for both the date and to remove the path 
prefix on the listed change files.


John Marino wrote:
> Let's start with a clean slate.  I am submitting several patches mainly 
> for DragonFlyBSD benefit.  The config.guess, config.rpath, and 
> config/tcl.m4 have been removed from the composite patch file.
> 
> 1) binutils-current.B.patch: Apply to trunk
> 2) binutils_221.B.patch: Apply to binutils-2_21-branch
> There are 9 files patched by these files.  The following commit messages 
> are good for both trunk and 2.21:
>   2011_03_08_changelog.txt
>   2011_03_08_changelog.ld.txt
>   2011_03_08_changelog.bfd.txt
>   2011_03_08_changelog.gas.txt
>   2011_03_08_changelog.gold.txt
> 
> 
> 3) config.guess.current.patch
> 4) config.guess.221.patch
> Pending GCC requirements, the preceding patches will update config.guess 
> to the last version defined by project/config.  Use the following commit 
> message: 2011_MM_DD_changelog.guess.txt
> 
> 
> 5) config.rpath.current.patch
> 6) config.rpath.221.patch
> Pending GCC requirements, the preceding patches will update config.guess 
> to the last version defined by project/gnulib.  Use the following commit 
> message: 2011_MM_DD_changelog.repath.txt
> 
> 
> I understand it could be a while before patches 4 --- 6 can be safely 
> incorporated.  It would be nice to have patch 1 and 2 incorporated soon 
> though.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> John
>