PATCH: Fix misc x32 issues
Mike Frysinger
vapier@gentoo.org
Mon Jun 20 04:24:00 GMT 2011
On Sunday, June 19, 2011 19:47:28 H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Sunday, June 19, 2011 17:53:59 Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> "H.J. Lu" writes:
> >> > I checked in this patch to fix misc x32 issues. I configured binutils
> >>
> >> > for target x86_64-x32-linux-gnu to build binutils with x32 format:
> >> x32 is not a vendor.
> >
> > yeah, that doesnt seem right. i dont think any other target is doing
> > this.
>
> This is mainly for testing before there is x32-linux
then should it really be committed to the tree ? doesnt your binutils
releases already carry custom patches ?
> which may never happen.
that's a bit odd ... seemed like things were on track to become a reality, and
the benefits seemed worth it. but i havent been tracking things too closely
myself.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20110620/a9e01708/attachment.sig>
More information about the Binutils
mailing list