bfd_link_hash_traverse

[Ian Lance Taylor]

Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> writes:

> I also don't see how we could create two levels of warning symbols
> with current code, given that warning symbols have the same name as
> the real symbol they point to.  See linker.c:link_action table
> current/prev both WARN gives NOACT.

Hmmm, you're right, I guess I am misremembering.  I guess we don't
handle multiple warnings on the same symbol.

Ian