forcing the linker to be a particular one (i.e. gold vs bfd)

[Vladimir Simonov]

On 01/19/2011 09:06 PM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
...

> If I remember correctly my original patch implemented option 2 by adding
> some more logic to gcc/exec-tool.in. I still think that this is the
> easiest solution. It should mean no other changes to gcc or the binutils
> and it makes use of a linker wrapper mechanism that is already in place.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>

Hi Nick,

The thread a bit long, may be because my questions also:)
Looks like you've lost the question about your patch.
See below

Regards
Vladimir

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
 > > Vladimir Simonov <sv@sw.ru> writes:
 > >
 >> >> Patch from Nick Clifton against gcc 4.4.x is here
 >> >> 
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc-4.4/debian/patches/gold-and-ld.diff?view=log&pathrev=4512
 > >
 > > I didn't look at it in detail, but that patch looks more or less fine to
 > > me.  Nick, have you sent it to gcc-patches?  Do you want to?
 > >