[6/6][PATCH] Respect symbol wrappers when computing symbol resolutions.

[H.J. Lu]

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>    Hi list,
>
>  I found this running the GCC testsuite, where on cygwin we use ld wrappers
> to allow replacement of libstdc++ new/delete operators.
>
> ld/ChangeLog:
>
> 2011-02-24  Dave Korn  <...
>
>        * plugin.c (get_symbols): Use wrapped lookup for undefined symbols.
>
>  I'd like it if someone can confirm that I've correctly interpreted the
> comment that precedes the definition of bfd_wrapped_link_hash_lookup, about
> how it should "only be used for references to an undefined symbol, not for
> definitions of a symbol"; I took that to mean that I should key off the
> initial state of defined-ness of the symbol passed from the plugin and call
> either a wrapped or unwrapped lookup accordingly, but possibly since we're
> asking about the resolution of a symbol, it would make as much sense to always
> treat this as if we were looking up an undefined reference and simply always
> call the wrapped lookup?
>

You can add a testcase to LTO tests on lto-mixed branch.


-- 
H.J.