PATCH: PR binutils/12283: bfd/doc doesn't support parallel build

[Andreas Schwab]

Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de> writes:

> My idea was to clean stamp-chew when $(MKDOC) was cleaned (i.e., in
> MOSTLYCLEANFILES).  It should not be a problem if the texi files rules'
> get triggered for the user of a tarball, because the generated files
> should be identical.  Even if the rules for the info files get
> triggered, they should not be a problem because of the 'missing' script.
> But I'd really like to test this well before proposing a new patch.

The current dependencies carefully chosen to avoid regenerating the
files when no sources are modified and the time stamps are preserved
(otherwise you could just depend on $(MKDOC) directly).

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."