binutils-2.20.1a replaced by 2.20.1 and so 2.21.1a?

[Steffen Dettmer]

> This was a license issue raised by the FSF: some files were
> derived from cgen files, but these cgen files weren't included
> in the tarballs.  We were asked by the FSF to repackage all the
> incomplete tarballs.

Thank you for your quick reply.

The issue itself is interesting. Sounds like much effort and may
even require undesired things like modifying release tags...
I though it would be sufficient to publish GPLed files, not that a
special form could be required (and I had assumed it had been
sufficient to put them on some public server or even just to some
CVS repository reabable by the public).

oki,

Steffen