On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:08:07PM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote: > Maybe it is a general failure > to assume (at least for pe-coff, but maybe for elf, too) that NOLOAD > means to discard sections from linking? Possibly. Can you say exactly how NOLOAD should behave from a COFF perspective? ie. what STYP_NOLOAD ought to do? -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM