[patch bfd]: Follow-up for dump of xdata SEH

Richard Henderson rth@redhat.com
Fri Oct 8 15:55:00 GMT 2010


On 10/08/2010 08:47 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> A wiser choice of end marker, namely
>>
>>> +    end_addr = (section->rawsize != 0 ? section->rawsize : section->size);
>>
>> means that you can eliminate the endx == NULL case entirely.
>>
>>
>> r~
>>
> 
> No, I can't use pdata for xdata section. Section containing xdata gets
> mapped in pex64_dump_xdata and not in pdata-block function. This is
> caused by the fact that xdata can be in separate '.xdata' section
> and/or in any other rdonly section.

Ah, I see.  Well, that's unfortunate.


r~



More information about the Binutils mailing list