[09/11] TI C6X binutils port: binutils/

[DJ Delorie]

-    case ELFOSABI_STANDALONE:	return _("Standalone App");
-    case ELFOSABI_ARM:		return "ARM";
     default:
+      if (osabi >= 64)
+	switch (elf_header.e_machine)

Is this really what we want to be doing here?  It seems inconsistent to
be handling these three ABIs in a machine-specific way, while the others
are all machine-independent.  I think it's misleading to return
"unknown" for known ABIs just because they're on the wrong chip,
especially as readelf is often used for debugging object files.