Bug for darwin + windows

NightStrike nightstrike@gmail.com
Fri Dec 10 20:08:00 GMT 2010


On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 08:49:59PM -0500, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 06:10:37PM -0500, NightStrike wrote:
>> >> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>> >
>> > configure with --disable-werror
>>
>> Can't we just fix the warnings?  That doesn't seem like the "right" solution....
>
> I think you have a crazy version of gcc.  Fix it.  The prototype gcc
> is warning about comes from

I don't understand what that is supposed to mean.

The shadowed variable is within binutils... from ldmain.h to libbfd.h.
 You are refusing to address that within your own product?

> /*
> INTERNAL_FUNCTION
>        bfd_generic_get_relocated_section_contents
>
> SYNOPSIS
>        bfd_byte *bfd_generic_get_relocated_section_contents
>          (bfd *abfd,
>           struct bfd_link_info *link_info,
>           struct bfd_link_order *link_order,
>           bfd_byte *data,
>           bfd_boolean relocatable,
>           asymbol **symbols);
>
> DESCRIPTION
>        Provides default handling of relocation effort for back ends
>        which can't be bothered to do it efficiently.
>
> */
>
> If we strip parameter names here we lose some documentation.  I've
> done that in the past and received complaints.  Renaming parameters is
> a never-ending exercise.
>
> --
> Alan Modra
> Australia Development Lab, IBM
>



More information about the Binutils mailing list