[PATCH] Fix binutils/gold build on NetBSD

[Ian Lance Taylor]

Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> writes:

> In the mean time, shouldn't this kind of portability call go to libiberty ?

I would personally only be inclined to put it in libiberty if it were a
proper reimplementation of mremap.  Since gold does not require a proper
reimplementation, the gold-specific version seems appropriate to me.
Also there's a good chance to no other program which uses libiberty will
want to use mremap, which is another reason to keep it in gold.

Ian