PATCH: Don't use i386_is_register in tc_x86_parse_to_dw2regnum

[H.J. Lu]

Hi,

tc_x86_parse_to_dw2regnum never calls i386_intel_simplify which
changes O_register to O_constant. There is no need to use
i386_is_register.  I am checking in this patch to remove
i386_is_register from tc_x86_parse_to_dw2regnum.


H.J.
---
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gas/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.4138
diff -u -p -r1.4138 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog	22 Apr 2010 00:43:37 -0000	1.4138
+++ ChangeLog	22 Apr 2010 00:57:43 -0000
@@ -1,5 +1,10 @@
 2010-04-21  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
 
+	* config/tc-i386.c (tc_x86_parse_to_dw2regnum): Don't use
+	i386_is_register.
+
+2010-04-21  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
+
 	* config/tc-i386.c (i386_is_register): Remove is_intel_syntax.
 	(x86_cons): Updated.
 	(parse_register): Likewise.
Index: config/tc-i386.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gas/config/tc-i386.c,v
retrieving revision 1.433
diff -u -p -r1.433 tc-i386.c
--- config/tc-i386.c	22 Apr 2010 00:43:38 -0000	1.433
+++ config/tc-i386.c	22 Apr 2010 00:57:44 -0000
@@ -8872,7 +8872,7 @@ tc_x86_parse_to_dw2regnum (expressionS *
   register_chars['.'] = saved_register_dot;
   allow_naked_reg = saved_naked_reg;
 
-  if (i386_is_register (exp) && exp->X_add_number >= 0)
+  if (exp->X_op == O_register && exp->X_add_number >= 0)
     {
       if ((addressT) exp->X_add_number < i386_regtab_size)
 	{