binutils-2.19.90 snapshot is available

[Dave Korn]

Dave Korn wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
>> Dave can you confirm?
> 
>   Been AFK all day, but have just kicked off a thorough test cycle; results in
> ~24 hours.

  I have a handful of regressions to investigate; they're likely to just mean
that the testcase output patterns need adjusting to match the new reality, but
the "-l test" might be something significant; I'll look into it this afternoon.

> +arm-epoc-pe.log:FAIL: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (disabled)
> +arm-epoc-pe.log:FAIL: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (enabled)
> +mcore-unknown-pe.log:FAIL: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (disabled)
> +mcore-unknown-pe.log:FAIL: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (enabled)
> +tic54x-unknown-coff.log:FAIL: -l: test (preparation)
> -arm-epoc-pe.log:PASS: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (disabled)
> -arm-epoc-pe.log:PASS: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (enabled)
> +arm-epoc-pe.log:FAIL: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (disabled)
> +arm-epoc-pe.log:FAIL: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (enabled)
> -mcore-unknown-pe.log:PASS: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (disabled)
> -mcore-unknown-pe.log:PASS: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (enabled)
> +mcore-unknown-pe.log:FAIL: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (disabled)
> +mcore-unknown-pe.log:FAIL: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (enabled)
> -tic54x-unknown-coff.log:PASS: -l: test (preparation)
> +tic54x-unknown-coff.log:FAIL: -l: test (preparation)

    cheers,
      DaveK