H.J. Lu wrote:
> I am checking in this patch to use enum instead of nested macros.
[...]
> +enum
> +{
> + REG_80 = 0,
> + REG_81 = REG_80 + 1,
> + REG_82 = REG_81 + 1,
Am I missing something, or is every single one of your ' = foo + 1' in
this patch completely redundant?
If they are in fact redundant, why have them?
David Daney