[RFC] extending bfd_print_private_bfd_data

Nick Clifton nickc@redhat.com
Mon Nov 9 11:34:00 GMT 2009


Hi Tristan,

>> I would be hesitant about adding new code to the BFD library when it 
>> is not really needed.
> 
> This is not really adding new code, but making existing code more 
> flexible.  Note that this concerns only
> coff/pe and mach-o.  For other targets I don't see such a need.

OK then, lats go ahead with this.

Cheers
   Nick



More information about the Binutils mailing list