PATCH: PR ld/10911: ld -s -static breaks IRELATIVE relocations

[H.J. Lu]

When stripping, we shouldn't return on STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols.  OK to
install?

Thanks.


H.J.
---
bfd/

2009-11-08  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

	PR ld/10911
	* elflink.c (elf_link_output_extsym): Don't return on
	STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol when stripping.

ld/testsuite/

2009-11-08  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

	PR ld/10911
	* ld-ifunc/ifunc-4a-x86.d: New.

diff --git a/bfd/elflink.c b/bfd/elflink.c
index cd016b7..0153411 100644
--- a/bfd/elflink.c
+++ b/bfd/elflink.c
@@ -8639,9 +8639,11 @@ elf_link_output_extsym (struct elf_link_hash_entry *h, void *data)
     strip = FALSE;
 
   /* If we're stripping it, and it's not a dynamic symbol, there's
-     nothing else to do unless it is a forced local symbol.  */
+     nothing else to do unless it is a forced local symbol or a
+     STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol.  */
   if (strip
       && h->dynindx == -1
+      && h->type != STT_GNU_IFUNC
       && !h->forced_local)
     return TRUE;
 
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-4a-x86.d b/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-4a-x86.d
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d06f589
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-4a-x86.d
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#ld: -s
+#readelf: -r --wide
+#target: x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
+#source: ifunc-4-x86.s
+
+#...
+[0-9a-f]+[ ]+[0-9a-f]+[ ]+R_[_0-9A-Z]+_IRELATIVE[ ]*[0-9a-f]*
+#pass