ARM long branch stubs: be8

Christophe LYON christophe.lyon@st.com
Fri Mar 13 14:16:00 GMT 2009


On 24.02.2009 15:48, Paul Brook wrote:
>>> What confused me is that objdump -d dumps opcodes in a different order in
>>> the BE8 case. Maybe it could be enhanced to make use of the BE8 EABI
>>> flag?
>> That would make sense to me, and the *-be8.d files could go away then.
>> Paul, Richard, what do you think?
> 
> I agree. IMHO the current be8 objdump behavior is a bug.
> 
> Paul
> 
Hi,

I propose the attached patch.
I did not remove the arm-be8.d test because there is no non-be8 variant.

Christophe.


-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: objdump.changelog
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20090313/81e043a1/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: objdump.patch
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20090313/81e043a1/attachment-0001.ksh>


More information about the Binutils mailing list