Proposal for STT_GNU_IFUNC and R_*_IRELATIVE

[Ian Lance Taylor]

"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:

> R_*_IRELATIVE
>
>       This relocation is similar to R_*_RELATIVE except that the
>       value used in this relocation is the program address returned
>       by the function, which takes no arguments, at the address of
>       the result of the corresponding R_*_RELATIVE relocation.
>
>       The purpose of this relocation to avoid name lookup for locally
>       defined STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols at load-time.

How is the "corresponding R_*_RELATIVE relocation" determined?

Ian