bfd_mach_*, old question?

[Eric Fisher]

Hello Nick,

Thank you for the reply.

> Well the only reason that I can think of is that there is no pressing need
> to make the change.  The current system works, so why change it ?
>

I agree with your point.

Actually, the problem I do care is the mips opcode table, see
http://www.sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-12/msg00310.html. So far,
almost all of membership bits have been occupied. I have no idea about
how to add a new CPU defination. I'm trying to write a program to
generate the opcode table automatically using condition functions
instead of bit mask.

Could anyone give me some suggestions?

Eric
Jan 4, 2009