New Patch: add new score3 ChangeLog

[brain.lin@sunplusct.com]

Dear Nick

Thanks for your checking last score patch.

According to your suggestions,I add the ChangeLog of score into the new 
score.patch . please check it again! 

In your last reply, there are two  fail test pattern for the score-elf 
toolchain,
    (1)FAIL: gas/score/branch_32
    (2)FAIL: gas/score/branch_32-lt
 I checked out a copy of binutils sourcecode from sourceware.org , but i 
did't find the two test patterns ,I would like to ask what the 
inconsistent place in my sourcecode with your?  or ,Please tell me what 
the testpatterns  where.



Thanks a lot

with my best regards

Brain.lin

>Hi Brain,
>>
>> 1,
>> According to your suggestions, I sent you the previous score.patch 
without 
>> the files that 
>> are regenerated (eg: bfd-in2.h & libbfd.h ), 
>> 
>> 2,
>> we builded binutils for score target with following steps:
>> (1).gas
>> * run: automake
>> 
>> (2).bfd
>> * run: automake
>> * run: autoconf
>> * run: make headers /* cd build/binutils/bfd */
>> 
>> (3).ld
>> * run: automake
>> 
>> (4).opcodes
>> * run: automake
>> * run: autoconf
>> 
>> (5).binutils
>> * run: automake
>> 
>> 
>> 3,And then ,Enter build direntory run respectively configure 
>> --prefix=install_dir   --target=score-elf ,make,make install 
>> New patch can be compiled successfully ,I would like to ask what the 
>> inconsistent steps with you ? 

>Nothing - in fact I must apologise because when I reapplied your patch 
>and regenerated the various files I then found that it built cleanly 
>without any problems.  (I think that I must have mistakenly applied an 
>older version of your patch last time.  Sorry).
>
>There are now only two points that need to be addressed:
>
>  1. ChangeLog entries for the various directories that are affected by 
>the patch.
>
>  2.  The GAS testsuite is showing two new failures for the score-elf 
>toolchain:
>
>   FAIL: gas/score/branch_32
>   FAIL: gas/score/branch_32-lt
>
>      Looking at the log these tests are failing because of error 
>messages like this from the assembler:
>
>   branch_32.s:162: Error: branch relocation truncate (0x244) [-2^9 ~ 
2^9]
>>Point 1 is important - I need the changelogs before I can check your 
>patch in.  Point 2 is less important - it could be fixed by a future 
>patch if necessary, although it would be nice if the score7 port had no 
>testsuite failures right from the start.
>
>Cheers
>   Nick
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: score.patch.bz2
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 137885 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20090224/34926c1f/attachment.obj>