bogus "ignoring changed section type" warning
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Fri Aug 7 00:51:00 GMT 2009
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:35:58PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Isn't this warning rather odd for code like this:
>
> .section .init.rodata,"a"
> .section .init.rodata,"a",@progbits
>
> especially since with just the first directive, the section ends up being
> progbits anyway (due to elf_fake_sections() deriving the type from the
> section flags)?
Yes, there ought to be a warning on the first directive rather than on
the second one.
> Wouldn't it hence make sense to guess an unspecified
> section type from the flags right away,
Probably.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
More information about the Binutils
mailing list