[PATCH-bfd] i386-mingw32-ld crash on x86_64 linux

[Dave Korn]

H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Dave Korn
> <dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Dave Korn wrote:
>>
>>>   Brilliant.  I'll run it through a full testsuite and we'll see about getting
>>> it checked in.  Thanks for contributing :)
>>  Tested on i686-pc-cygwin natively, and cross from i686-pc-linux-gnu to
>> {arm-epoc-pe, arm-wince-pe, i386-pc-netbsdpe, i386-pc-pe, i586-pc-interix,
>> i586-unknown-beospe, i686-pc-cygwin, i686-pc-mingw32, mcore-unknown-pe,
>> powerpcle-unknown-pe, sh-unknown-pe, thumb-epoc-pe, x86_64-pc-freebsd,
>> x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, x86_64-pc-mingw32} without regressions.
>>
>> bfd/ChangeLog
>>
>> 2009-04-19  Peter O'Gorman  <binutils@mlists.thewrittenword.com>
>>            Alan Modra  <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
>>            Dave Korn  <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com>
>>
>>        * peXXigen.c (_bfd_XXi_swap_sym_in):  Fix name handling w.r.t
>>        long names and non-NUL-terminated strings.
>>
>>  Ok?
>>
> 
> Where is the patch?

  Oops.  Here is what I tested; it differs from Peter's original only in two
insignificant whitespaces.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: copy_name.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1660 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/attachments/20090420/74cb92d1/attachment.bin>