[PATCH-bfd] i386-mingw32-ld crash on x86_64 linux

[Dave Korn]

  Oh, one clarifications:

Dave Korn wrote:
> Peter O'Gorman wrote:

>> Is this patch more acceptable?
> 
>   Well, the strcmp->strncmp bit is correct.  The changes to zero out _n_zeroes
> and _n_offsets... no, not really.  I mean, they're not wrong, but I don't
> think we should check in patches that we don't know how or why they work.

  However it might be a perfectly practical stopgap solution for your customer
who reported the issue, I was just talking about what we should do in binutils
CVS.

    cheers,
      DaveK