Patch bfd/doc/Makefile.am and Interix 64bit target
Jerker Bäck
jerker.back@telia.com
Sun Jun 22 14:06:00 GMT 2008
Could this be changed?
My compiler doesn't like to have options after the source file.
This patch simply move the source file last in the command.
Some questions:
Is this the preferred way to propose changes in binutils?
Is the patch format OK?
I also would like to add my target to binutils:
x86_64-*-interix*
Is that OK? How to do that in a preferred way?
Is it better to attach a file with changes?
Thanks
Jerker
--------------------------------------------------------
diff -urp src.old/bfd/doc/Makefile.am src/bfd/doc/Makefile.am
--- src.old/bfd/doc/Makefile.am Mon Apr 9 17:36:44 2007
+++ src/bfd/doc/Makefile.am Sun Jan 6 11:03:16 2008
@@ -60,9 +60,8 @@ INCLUDES = -I.. -I$(srcdir)/.. -I$(srcdi
-I$(srcdir)/../../intl -I../../intl
$(MKDOC): $(srcdir)/chew.c
- $(CC_FOR_BUILD) -o chew.$$$$ $(srcdir)/chew.c \
- $(CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) $(LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) $(H_CFLAGS) \
- $(INCLUDES); \
+ $(CC_FOR_BUILD) -o chew.$$$$ $(CFLAGS_FOR_BUILD)
$(LDFLAGS_FOR_BUILD) \
+ $(H_CFLAGS) $(INCLUDES) $(srcdir)/chew.c; \
$(SHELL) $(srcdir)/../../move-if-change chew.$$$$ $(MKDOC)
chew.o: chew.c
--------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Binutils
mailing list