size_input_section calcs output_offset incorrectly for merged sections
Mon Jan 7 18:27:00 GMT 2008
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 08:59:04AM -0800, Michael Eager wrote:
> It seems to me that output_offset should be the same in both
> cases. I've run a couple tests which work with this change.
> Does this seem correct?
No. The code is correct for excluded sections in general. You
shouldn't be using symbols from merged sections directly. See
Australia Development Lab, IBM
More information about the Binutils