Why were those codes removed from bfd_elf_match_symbols_in_sections?
Alan Modra
amodra@bigpond.net.au
Fri Feb 22 23:45:00 GMT 2008
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:08:38PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00407.html
>
> removed section name comparison in
> bfd_elf_match_symbols_in_sections. When it is called from
> match_group_member, it has to always check symbol tables
> to compare 2 sections in section group, whose section
> names are started with .gnu.linkonce. I'd like to put the
> .gnu.linkonce. section name check back to avoid unnecessary
> symbol table lookup.
Do we have .gnu.linkonce.* sections in section groups?? If so, why
should they be treated differently from other sections in groups?
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
More information about the Binutils
mailing list